FREEMASONRY TODAY
Write To: THE EDITOR, FREEMASONRY TODAY,
FREEMASONS’ HALL, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LONDON WC2B 5AZ
Email: editor@ugle.org.uk
Letters emailed to the editor should not be sent as attachments. Please include a home address and telephone number.
MASONIC PROSPECTUS
Sir,
In his inspirational article in
Freemasonry Today No. 6 Jonathan
Tod makes a good case for the issue of
a Masonic Prospectus to interested
enquirers. There are many for whom
such an information booklet would be
helpful and entirely appropriate
although there are still some entrants,
surely, who already know a great deal
about Freemasonry before joining,
through friends and family
connections.
I think that he touches on the reason
that such a document has not yet been
produced when he says that everyone
has their own path in Freemasonry.
That is why the Craft has such a wide
appeal and why it is so difficult to
categorise those who would be most at
home within its ranks. Its wide range of
appeal is both a strength and a
weakness. It would be difficult to avoid
controversial statements which some
would regard as negative in a
meaningful Prospectus.
Colin Bissell,
Langport Lodge No. 8072
Eastbourne, Sussex
THE SPHINX AS ANUBIS
Sir,
I was surprised that there were no
letters regarding the Sphinx article in
Freemasonry Today No. 6. Surely I am
not the only reader who was fascinated
by Temple’s theory of the original head
of the Sphinx being that of the god
Anubis especially as it is backed up by
references to writings and carvings of the
Old Kingdom period.
I would like to suggest that if the
drawing on page 36 is accepted as
accurate then the weight of the jaw-line
extending out from the body mass would
have needed some support; a pillar or a
wall extending out under the jaw
perhaps. In your photograph in the centre
of the page there can be seen a bulge of
stone in the centre of the chest, just
where a supporting structure could have
been. We will never know but it is
pleasant to speculate.
David Lloyd-Jones MA
Lord Warden Lodge No 1096
Deal, Kent
RANK IN FREEMASONRY
Sir,
I write in regard to the many letters
written in reply to your editorial in
Freemasonry Today No.6.
Bro. Marjoribanks has put his finger
on the problem: we do love our pomp
and circumstance. In that we share the
procedures in other Anglo-Saxon
jurisdictions, but alas, by placing so
much importance on self-aggrandisement
we do so miss the point
of Freemasonry. What does our Grand
Lodge have to say on this? See the
leaflet Freemasonry: An Approach to
Life. ‘Freemasonry’, it tells us, ‘
teaches moral lessons and self-knowledge’.
If as a committed
Freemason I apply myself in this way,
should I be surprised that my apron,
after 33 years, is still light blue? I don’t
think so. We should all work hard at our
Freemasonry, at self-knowledge and
through that at increasing the sum total
of moral well-being in the world, but at
the same time our own Grand Lodge
makes that more difficult, by dangling
all these intricate bits of regalia in front
of us, mesmerising us with the promise
of personal grandeur.
As far as Bro Shaw’s letter goes, it
is not true that you ‘condemned’ the
Brother; it is the system that has failed
us, by placing so much importance on
rank and promotion. I attended, some
time ago, a seminar for Visiting
Officers. A good 60% of the time was
spent discussing the best way to get
promotion to, and advancement within
Grand Rank for Brethren in the Lodges
they looked after. I submit this has
nothing to do with Freemasonry, and I
am willing to provide anyone who
wishes with a much more exciting
programme with which to fill their
time, leading to a true appreciation of
what this wonderful and ancient Art has
to offer.
Julian Rees
Kirby Lodge No 2818
London
Sir,
I refer to the ‘Letter from the Editor’
in Freemasonry Today No. 6. The Brother
who has spent thirty-three years in
masonry aspiring to a better apron is
obviously misguided. However, as it is
‘the hope of reward that sweetens labour’
we would be less than human if we were
not irritated when Brothers, junior to
ourselves in terms of time in masonry and
years through the Chair and with a similar
masonic record are promoted over us.
The system of masonic honours
needs reviewing urgently and perhaps
parts of it abolishing. Many Brethren feel
that it would be more appropriate if those
appointed to Past Provincial rank all
received the same honour.
We do not join Freemasonry for
masonic honours but as they are constantly
paraded before us, it would be nice to know
on what basis they are awarded. We need
much greater transparency.
R. G. Wadd
Cavendish Lodge No 3055
Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Sir,
It is my humble opinion that the
whole promotion system should be
radically altered. The current system is
divisive and creates ill-feeling among
Brethren. I would suggest that there only
be two Provincial ranks, i.e. Senior and
Junior. This would have the effect of
allowing Provincial Grand Masters to
reward the workers without the bickering
of why someone has gained a higher rank
than another.
If I had my way there would be just
Brethren and Worshipful Brethren and no
Provincial ranks at all. However, I accept
that this is far too radical as many treasure
their ranks, meaningless as they are.
Peter R. Hyde
Sykes Lodge No 1040
Great Driffield, Yorkshire North and East Riding
Sir,
I refer to Roger Marjoribanks’ letter
in which he talks about the sheer hard
work that accompanies the high offices in
the Craft.
Having been raised only two years
ago and thus new to Freemasonry I am
glad that Bro. Marjoribanks has pointed
this out. Needless to say, I am in no
position to discuss or know what my
Brethren with senior offices do, or do not
do, but it is true, from my experience,
that the senior Brethren of my lodge
work extremely hard at keeping the lodge
and Freemasonry alive and well.
Although at present I confess
that ranks and hierarchies hold no
interest whatsoever for me – it is the
spiritual dimension of Freemasonry and
the way it can change one’s life that
concerns me at present – my outlook
could change as I progress through the
offices of my lodge and become a senior
brother myself.
I remember very well the tears of joy
showing on a senior brother’s face when
he collected an award on behalf of
another senior brother who could no
longer attend lodge meetings due to poor
health. It was then that I realised what the
ranks and awards really meant: these are
tokens of appreciation that have an
emotional value rather than a hierarchical
one.
In my opinion, as a youngish
Freemason, ranks and awards are
symbolic gestures of appreciation and
acknowledgment which add to the real
gift that Freemasonry confers on us all:
its teachings and the way these can
transform our lives for the better.
Darren Lorente
St Mary Islington No 5451
London
WAIVE LODGE FEES
Sir,
I was at a masonic meeting and there
was present an Initiate. When it came to
the Risings the Secretary reported to the
Master that a Brother had resigned
because he could no longer afford the
annual fee. This prompted a question to
me from the Initiate to the effect that
were we only welcome in the Craft as
long as we could still keep paying?
He commented on how many years
the Brother had been a member and had
obviously given a considerable amount
of time and money to the Craft and was
now being rejected because he could no
longer pay the annual fees. This is, of
course, very true.
I belong to some associations that
waive the fee once a member reaches the
age of eighty years. Why do we not do
the same. It would not cost the Craft
anything. The elderly member could still
attend his meetings and would, I am sure,
still contribute in some small way such as
buying a couple of raffle tickets at the
Festive Board.
Tony Davie
Vyne Lodge No 7612
Basingstoke, Hampshire & Isle of Wight
EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY
Sir,
In these days of equality and diversity
I wonder if a particular word within the
Obligation spoken during the ceremony
of Raising should be changed?
The word in question is ‘wife’: ...and
most strictly respect the honour of those
nearest and dearest to him, in the persons
of his wife, his sister, and his child...
A member of my lodge is openly gay
and a number of others are not married
but are cohabiting, so perhaps the more
commonly used word ‘partner’ should be
applied to better reflect modern family
life?
Bruce Baker
Ansgar Lodge No 5304
Uxbridge, Middlesex
YOU’LL NEVER WALK ALONE
Sir,
Having read the article detailing the
links between Freemasonry and Football
on Merseyside in Freemasonry Today,
No. 5, I feel that Cecil Lodge, No. 3274,
has had a significant influence on the
development of both our Premier League
teams.
John McKenna, who you mention,
was the second Master of Cecil Lodge in
1909 and became chairman of Liverpool
F. C. and later president of the Football
League. He introduced into the lodge
W.C. Cuff who went on to become
chairman of Everton F.C. and followed
John McKenna into the chairmanship of
the Football League.
Sidney Reakes, Master of Cecil
Lodge in 1952, went on to become
chairman of Liverpool F.C. at the time
that the Board took what proved in
hindsight to be the momentous decision
to appoint a little-known Scotsman,
William Shankly, to be manager of the
club. This appointment, it would be
argued, changed the fortunes of
Liverpool F.C. forever and has had
repercussions on the success of the club
to this day.
It is with some justification and a
degree of satisfaction that the members
of Cecil Lodge feel that they have had a
part to play in the development of the
most successful club in English football.
Bill Roberts
Cecil Lodge No 3274
Liverpool, West Lancashire
UNLAWFUL SOCIETIES ACT
Sir,
In her article ‘Freemasonry and the
French Revolution’ in Freemasonry
Today No. 7, Diane Clements states that
the Unlawful Societies Act was the first
statutory acknowledgement in the United
Kingdom of the existence of
Freemasonry. Well, not exactly.
The Unlawful Societies Act did not
apply to Ireland at all but only to
England, Wales and Scotland. Thus,
when the Ireland Home Rule Bill was
being considered by Parliament in 1912
it became clear to the Grand Lodge of
Ireland that because the provisions of the
1799 Act would henceforth apply, that
they might become vulnerable to being
prosecuted as an Unlawful Society. They
thus sought, and gained, the same
exemption from the Act as England,
Wales and Scotland gained in 1799 – and
the Grand Master Mason of Scotland was
instrumental in getting that clause placed
in the Home Rule Bill. This was a small
quirk certainly but enough to cause our
Brothers in Ireland to seek some
protection. We were taught to be
cautious.
John Belton
Internet Lodge No 9659
Manchester
WOMEN IN FREEMASONRY
Sir,
Following your letters regarding
Women and Freemasonry your readers
might like a light-hearted angle on this.
Grenadiers Lodge No. 66 has had a
long and interesting history and is lucky
enough to have every minute book from
its inception in October 1793. We need to
go back to 1757: the Lodge was meeting
above the Running Horse Inn at Hyde
Park Corner. Our minutes read: April
13th, The Rt Worshipful Bro Storey paid
a fine of 2p for ordering a woman into ye
lodge in lodge hours.
Highly reprehensible conduct on the
part of the R W Brother which doubtless
led to the next offence: The Worshipful
Junr Warden Br Ward pd 2p for kissing
the aforesd femail.
Things lingered on but the minutes of
November 23rd record that, It was
resolved that Brothers Ward and Storey
made all differences up and shake hands
and agree to pay a bottle ye first offender.
Geoffrey Aldridge
Secretary, Grenadiers Lodge No 66
London
ITS THAT MAN AGAIN
Sir,
In 1952, at the tender age of fifteen
years and six months, leaving my parents
and family in a state of shock, I joined
the Royal Navy. My parents put me on
the midnight train to Torpoint in
Cornwall to join the training ship HMS
Fisgard as an Artificer Apprentice.
After a year of trying out all the various
trades of an Artificer I decided that I would
like to become an Engine-Room Artificer
(a worker in metal). Three years later my
apprenticeship finished and off I went to
sea were I spent most of the next twelve
years and enjoyed every minute of it.
At the ripe old age of seventy-one I
entered into my second apprenticeship as
a Freemason. And once again it was a
learning experience. During my raising in
the Third Degree a name brought back
vague memories of my early years as an
Engine-Room Artificer and looking at my
old blazer and our motto it all came back
to me.
William J. Hodges
Leyland St. Andrews Lodge No 7391
Leyland, West Lancashire
RECOGNITION BY DAY
Sir,
Many years ago I was consulted by a
middle-aged man with suspected arthritis of
the fingers. I found no evidence of this but
to make assurance ‘double-sure’ referred
him to the X-Ray Department of our
hospital. It was only when he returned with
his film that I recognised him as a Brother.
Dr. B.A. Latham
Royal Clarence Lodge No 271
Brighton, Sussex
Issue 50, Autumn 2009
|
© Grand Lodge Publications Ltd 1997-2010
|
|