FREEMASONRY TODAY
WHITHER DIRECTING OUR COURSE?
Sir,
Over the past few months I have been
reflecting upon the article ‘Whither Directing
Our Course?’ delivered by our Pro Grand
Master, Lord Northampton at the Cornerstone
Society Conference, together with recent
correspondence in this journal. Lord
Northampton considers that in Anglo-Saxon
Freemasonry change is needed, and has
recently appointed a Rulers’ Forum to assist
him in determining what that change is to be.
My experience in the Craft persuades
me that, inter-alia, there is an absence of
emphasis on our spiritual journey in this
life. For too many, Freemasonry is just a
‘gentlemens’ club' – a place to perform a
fairly meaningless ritual followed by a
good time at the festive board. For others,
it affords a splendid opportunity for the
mediocre to attain high office and
recognition among their Brethren, without
the expenditure of much energy, be it
physical or intellectual. With so much
emphasis on, and genuflection towards,
rank, it is hardly surprising that so many
Brethren aspire to attain within
Freemasonry what would be denied them
in other social spheres.
Having pursued a study of the hidden
mysteries of Nature and Science for most
of my life, it saddens me that most of my
Brethren shun this aspect of the Craft.
Outside the bounds of Freemasonry
attainment of degrees is associated with
some form of academic study. I think that
it is regrettable that Freemasonry contains
no curriculum requiring formal study and
examination for Brethren to progress
within the Craft beyond the third degree.
Corporations have Mission Statements
and a set of objectives. Thereby, the world
at large is made aware of the purpose of the
corporation and employees have a focus
for their thoughts and actions. I have
searched in vain for something similar in
Freemasonry. Perhaps this is among the
‘hidden mysteries’!
There is a pervading non-judgmental
attitude within the Craft, together with a set
of Rules and Regulations full of ‘thou shalt
nots’, which has engendered a sycophantic
culture. Despite this, one hopes that the Pro
Grand Master will receive the objective
feed-back he will require if the right changes
are to be made. Lord Northampton considers
that Freemasonry is a force for good. This
seems to me to be a pious hope rather than
an objective observation. With the exception
of charity, it seems to me that Freemasonry
has as much force as a hunk of candyfloss!
One hopes that Freemasonry will one day be
the force for good that the he believes.
Heaven knows, the world needs it!
Harry Morgan,
Goxhell, North Lincolnshire
St. Matthew Lodge, No. 1447
PUBLICITY FOR FREMASONRY
Sir,
In response to the letter by David
Hayes in your last issue about
Freemasonry never being in the news
despite all the good work we do, it is an
almost universally accepted axiom that
‘good deeds do not make good copy’. The
given example of the £3m donation given
by Mark Masons to the Osteoporosis
Society is a case in point. The fact that
Mark Masons raised this sum from their
own pockets is awe-inspiring, but in the
modem idiom is not news. To make it news
you must have an ‘x’ factor, such as a
missing half a million that cannot be
accounted for, or accounted for in a
spurious or suspicious manner. Now that
makes it news. The £3m is just a figure,
which the man in the street may disbelieve
anyway. As to having high powered PR
firms fight our corner. I understand they
are employed, but of course must confine
themselves to instructions of their clients.
Some years ago I came to the
conclusion that the only way we are going
to change the public perception of us is to
buy space in a give-away news paper at
Province level and confine the Nationals to
Grand Lodge. That is advertising space,
and in that space you print information
about Freemasonry. The thing that I thought
up was ‘Ten things about Freemasonry you
probably didn’t know.’ These include a list
of obscure facts about Freemasonry, such
as George Washington being a Freemason,
or Rudyard Kipling. Mixed with this
information would be snippets of a modern
nature, such as the £3m donation. Change
this list every week for every issue. To
achieve our end this must be like water on
granite gradually wearing away the
resistance. I contacted the local give-away
newspaper for prices of a week in week out
publication, and was surprised to learn that
if every mason in West Kent made an
annual payment of £2 we could afford to do
this. At a meeting of my lodge I explained
my plan, and how much it would cost each
member, then fmished up by asking ‘Who
will give me £2 a year to improve the
public perception of Freemasonry?’ and got
a roar of approval in response.
My suggestion to Province was never
acted upon.
T.A. Lynch,
Sidcup, Kent.
Lesnes Abbey Lodge, No. 7393
Sir,
If I may add to the contributions of
Bros Jenner and Hayes in your winter
edition; I believe that both these Brothers
have identified the correct path that
Freemasonry must now take.
Bro. Hayes bemoans the lack of PR in
the provinces. He is right. Recently I and a
fellow Brother were asked to deliver a
Grand Charity cheque to a major local
hospice which had not only received
£37,000 from Grand Charity but also
countless other cheques from local lodges
over the years. I was astonished at the
knowledge base of the hospice’s fund
raiser. In a 10-minute training session we
were able to feed her curiosity about who
‘these Freemasons’ were and what they
did. She was very pro-mason at the end of
this chat. It made me wonder how many of
our other beneficiaries are equally
unaware. We were also able to persuade
the local paper to publish a picture and
therefore did our small bit to add to the
image of Freemasonry in the area.
Bro Jenner wishes to see us wear
regalia more in public. He is right. The
decision where and when must be held at a
Provincial level, in order for decorum to be
maintained, but Provinces need to expand
the number of times this permission is
granted. Hitler is long dead and I think we
can now risk the public seeing who we are.
To the uninitiated, an organisation with
an invisible membership is potentially
scary. This was brought home to me years
ago when a female councillor who had not
been granted a particular chair had blamed
her lack of promotion on ‘these masons’
who had, she suggested, created a cabal to
exclude her. Of the four councillors she
mentioned, three were not and never had
been masons. A more visible membership
might have precluded this view.
Huge efforts have been made over the
last 10 years in explaining Freemasonry to
the outside world. Open days at centres,
white table meetings, stands at local shows;
all work to remove in ignorance that those
opponents of Freemasonry seek to continue.
We need to do far more at all levels. I would
start with those who benefit from our
charity.
Garry Heath,
Henley on Thames.
Regattas Lodge 9660
Sir,
In the last edition of Freemasonry
Today, Paul Jenner of Westerham wrote
about the wearing of masonic regalia at
‘official’ functions – in this case, the laying
of a wreath at his local war memorial on
Remembrance Sunday – which has
provoked me to much thought.
On the face of it, there seems no reason
why masons shouldn’t appear in public, or
at least at public events, clothed in the
badges of the order, just as boy scouts, girl
guides, members of the British Legion and
others do. We’re not a ‘secret society’ so
why be secretive? There’s no reason at all
why we should be secretive, but there’s a
good reason, I think, why we should be
invisible.
I used to work with a very charming
fellow who was gay. He had been a
policeman and a Royal Marine; he was as
decent and honest as the day is long. I
remember him becoming extremely
agitated one day at the suggestion that he
might take part in a Gay Pride march. He
wasn’t ashamed of being gay, any more
than I’m ashamed of being left-handed, but
he disliked intensely the idea of defining
himself as being ‘different’ by getting
himself up like something out of the Rio
carnival. He said that he’d happily take
part in a Gay Pride march so long as
everyone involved wore the clothes that
they wore to work. That would
demonstrate that there were firemen and
barristers and surgeons and soldiers, etc.,
etc., who were gay, just as there were
people in all walks of life who were lefthanded.
Their sexuality was a part of them
but it didn’t define them, any more than
skin colour or faith defines a man. So it is
with Freemasons, is it not? We actually
spend very little time got up in aprons but
– hopefully – we spend every available
minute of our time doing good in the
world, as citizens of it.
Andrew Montgomery,
Richmond.
Yorick Lodge, No. 2771
FREEMASONRY AND RELIGION
Sir,
I freely admit that my letter on
Freemasonry and Religion in the Autumn
edition of Freemasonry Today was
intended to stir up debate on what I believe
are matters fundamental to Masonry.
Judging by the drubbing I have received I
seem to have succeeded!
Of course, we invoke the assistance of
the Great Architect of the Universe in all
our undertakings and His existence is
central to the required belief in a Supreme
Being. We do the same, or ought to, in
many other walks of life. It is true too that
there are instances where seemingly
spiritual aspirations occur. Peter Adams
quotes for example from the Exhortation,
how the object of the Second Degree is to
lead us through the paths of heavenly
science even to the throne of God Himself.
Let us examine this. It is typical of
other instances of what I might call quasispiritual
parts of the ritual. What does it
mean? How can the Second Degree
possibly lead to the throne of
God Himself! It does nothing of the
kind. It doesn’t even pretend to. It requires
us to make the Liberal Arts and Sciences
our future study and to extend our
researches into the hidden mysteries of
Nature and Science, and be thereby able to
estimate the wonderful works of the
Almighty, though it puts the last only
second to discharging one’s duties as a
mason.
Masonry is defined as ‘A peculiar
system of morality, veiled in allegory and
illustrated by symbols.’ That says it all. It
is a moral institution. not a spiritual one,
and I have no doubt that is how the
overwhelming majority of masons view it.
For spiritual uplift. as J.F. Fern contended.
one should look to the Church of one’s
faith. Neither of the official masonic
statements, Aims and Relationships of the
Craft and Freemasonry and Religion, make
any claims towards spiritual inspiration.
The Brotherly Love. Relief and Truth
and the happiness that one can experience
from being a mason makes it not only such
a rewarding institution, but a unique one.
Perhaps, after all, there is spiritual value in
that.
Peter Smith,
Oadby, Leicestershire.
Semper Eadem Lodge, No. 3091
Sir,
Previous correspondence on the
subject of Freemasonry, religion and
spirituality has produced several threads
and I would like to respond to two of them.
I suggest that spirituality is not a belief
system, whereas a religion, with its
associated dogmas, is. Freemasonry is not
a religion as it isn’t a belief system and has
no dogma. It is an initiatory path.
Spirituality is not only found in the context
of religion. Its exploration is a matter of
personal choice, in Freemasonry or
elsewhere. For me, spirituality is to do
with that part of man which unconsciously
knows itself to be at one with the universe,
the development or evolution of the life
force – that which is non-physical, the
essence of all living things, the divine
spark, which departs on death of the
physical body.
Through its ceremonies, degree by
degree, Freemasonry helps tap into that
life force by using more than one of our
senses at a time, by experiencing instead of
simply listening to or viewing a cleverly
worded story. Through interpretation of its
symbols, Freemasonry provides greater
freedom of thought, enabling us to rise
above dogma and reach a far deeper
understanding about life and our purpose
within it. It enables us to develop
ourselves, intellectually, morally and
spiritually, for the common good; to
expand our consciousness and to look for
that divine spark in ourselves and
others, however deeply it is buried. It
helps build the temple of humanity.
Brian Roberts,
Grand Commander,
British Federation
International Order of Co-Freemasonry Le
Droit Humain
UNKNOWN APRON
Sir,
I attach a photograph of an apron
whose origins I am trying to trace and
which was loaned to me by a Scottish lady
from Aberdeen. The apron was presented
to me see if I could research its origins by
a Brother who was a neighbour of the lady
in April 2006 and I have been trying to
establish its origin ever since. The apron
belonged to her late father and was found
in his effects after he died. As far as she is
aware he was not a Freemason but he did
have connections with the Incorporated
Trades of Aberdeen as a Carpenter,
however, enquiries in that direction have
drawn a blank.
I believe it is Scottish in origin but it
does have some unusual symbols and may
not necessarily be masonic. The apron is
made completely of leather and is hand
painted; the cords are also leather and it is in
remarkably good condition but there is no
indication of a date on it anywhere. I think it
may date around 1800 or even earlier.
The symbols which are creating the
most problems are the plough or harrow on
the bottom right and the seahorse, pipe-fish
or ‘serpent’ by the left-hand pillar. I have
never seen either of these on any apron
before. Standing against the right-hand
pillar it what appears to be a quill pen. The
Rose and Thistle interlaced above could be
representative of a connection between
Scotland and England. The comet above
has I believe some masonic connections as
do the seven stars. The rest of the symbols
are not only common to Freemasonry but
also to many other fraternal orders. There
are the initials RL which do not mean
anything to the lady who owns it. The
globes on the pillars are not terrestrial or
celestial and I came across a similar design
in the Transactions of OQC No, 118 Figure
4, Page 143 on a medallion in the paper ‘In
search of the Blazing Star’ by Chris
Impens but that is as far as I have got.
Fred Lomax, Editor,
Manchester Association for Masonic
Research.
Email: fredlomax@blueyonder.co.uk
NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCE
Sir,
Reading Paul Devereux’s article in
Freemasonry Today, Autumn 2006,
recalled an experience I had in 1942.
I had a tonsillectomy, and at some
time during the post-operative recovery
period I had to be taken back to the
operating theatre to stabilise some
bleeding.
During one of these procedures, I
had a strange vision. I was travelling
through a long tunnel with a bright
light at the end. I had the distinct
impression that I was not myself – I
was neither male nor female, merely a
being travelling through space. I
never reached the light, and the next
thing I knew was waking up in my
hospital bed.
In those days, near-death experience
was not discussed, but if it had been, I
suppose my experience would have come
under that phenomenon.
Ronald Bird,
Malta.
Seafarers Lodge, No. 9589
Issue 40, Spring 2007
|
© FreemasonryToday 1997-2008
|
|