FREEMASONRY TODAY
John and Mary Wilkes in a painting by Johann Zoffany, who was a member of Pilgrim
Lodge, No. 238, in London.
photo: National Portrait Gallery
John Wilkes
Matthew Scanlan on a Whimsical Eighteenth Century Figure
John Wilkes is primarily remembered today as a notorious wit and rascal, and
as the prime mover in a popular radical movement that emerged in England
during the early reign of King George III. Yet few people know that Wilkes
was also a Freemason. And even fewer are aware he was actually initiated in prison
at a time of great social and political unrest.
Born in London, well educated and
married to a rich Buckinghamshire
heiress, Wilkes fraternised with many
associations during his somewhat
turbulent career, and he was a more than
willing participant in the bawdy revelries
that took place in Buckinghamshire’s
West Wycombe Park (popularly known
as the Hell-Fire Club). But aside from all
the tomfoolery, Wilkes had a serious side
and he was also politically ambitious.
In 1757 he was elected MP for
Aylesbury, but after failing to win the
political advancement he so craved, he
began to pen anti-government polemics
in the Whig journal, The Monitor,
accusing the authorities of curtailing
traditional British freedoms. It did not
take long for the government to react,
and in November 1762 a warrant was
issued for all those involved in the
production of the journal, including the
city attorney Arthur Beardmore and the
Rev. John Entick. Undeterred, Wilkes
continued to lambaste the government in
The North Briton, and for a time his
risqué polemics were tolerated, but when
he published a vitriolic attack in issue
number 45 of the journal, they pounced.
Branded a ‘seditious libel’, the
authorities promptly arrested forty-nine
people associated with the journal’s
publication, including Wilkes himself.
However, the government was soon
forced into an embarrassing climb-down,
as a sympathetic Whig judge ruled their
detention ‘illegal’ and invoked Habeas
Corpus.
FREEMASONRY
Interestingly, not only were
Beardmore and Entick both Freemasons,
but they were also Grand Officers of the
Premier Grand Lodge. Indeed, the Rev.
John Entick published several masonic
tomes, including three revised editions of
Anderson’s masonic constitutions (1756,
1767, and 1776). Furthermore, in 1765,
when Arthur Beardmore gave the
conventional City address, a print went
on sale which depicted him patriotically
showing his son the Magna Carta,
alongside several prominent masonic
symbols.
Eventually the authorities got the
upper hand when a cache of ‘obscene’
and ‘seditious’ writings were discovered
at Wilkes’ home, and he was obliged to
decamp to France. Wilkes returned to
England in the autumn of 1767 and
immediately sought election as MP for
the City of London. Although he failed in
this attempt, he was soon thereafter
returned for the seat of Middlesex. News
of his victory was greeted with a good
deal of riotous behaviour and for two
days the city was left to the mercy of a
drunken rabble. At first the authorities
tried to ignore the situation, but
eventually the chaos had become
intolerable and Wilkes was sentenced to
twenty-two months in the King’s Bench
prison.
IMPRISONMENT
However, his incarceration only
seemed to inflame the situation, and on
10 March 1768 huge crowds chanting
‘Wilkes and Liberty’ gathered south of
the Thames on St. George’s Fields in the
environs of the gaol.
By mid-afternoon the
crowd had swelled to
an estimated twenty
thousand, and as the
temperature of the
throng reached
boiling point, the
guards opened fire,
killing six and
wounding fifteen.
The event, which
became known as the
St. George’s Fields
massacre, did little to
quell the unrest and
it only seemed to
stir the sentiments
of the crowd, and,
as a result, the
government attempted
to diffuse the
situation by
reversing Wilkes’s
outlawry.
Yet, despite the
concession, events
surrounding Wilkes’
struggle now seemed
to have gained a
momentum all their
own, and the mantra
of the disaffected was
heard far beyond
England’s shores. In
July 1768 the Boston
based ‘Sons of Liberty’
sent Wilkes
congratulations on the
result of his election and
encouraged him in his
brave struggle in the
cause of freedom;
interestingly, the letter
was co-signed by Joseph
Warren, a prominent
American Freemason.
Wilkes replied that he
would make the interests
of America ‘the study of
his life’ and he
commiserated with them
on the dispatch of British
troops to Boston. He
then published a letter in
the St. James’ Chronicle
which virtually accused
the government of premeditating
‘the St.
George’s Fields
massacre’. The
government’s reaction
was swift, and on 3
February 1769 Wilkes
was expelled from
Parliament. News of his
expulsion was met with riots across the
capital and whole houses were pulled
down in Drury Lane before angry crowds
were dispersed by the guards.
RE-ELECTION TO PARLIAMENT
Wilkes, meanwhile, remained
steadfast and sought re-election at
Brentford. On the morning of 16
February a large crowd defied a torrential
downpour and gathered in front of the
toll booth. As no-one stood against him
the ballot proved in his favour and he
was once again returned to Parliament.
That night, vast torch-carrying crowds
accompanied by men on horseback,
beating drums and playing French horns,
marched past the King’s Bench prison.
While inside, Wilkes threw a dinner party
for his supporters and the company
feasted on a swan brought in by an
admirer.
But despite the strength of feeling, on
17 February Wilkes was expelled from
Parliament once more. His supporters
were outraged and they defiantly
resolved to return him to Parliament as
often as the Commons expelled him.
Violent disturbances took place all over
London and according to several
contemporary accounts the country
appeared to be ‘on the verge of
revolution’.
Intriguingly, the very next day, the
Jerusalem Lodge, No. 44 met in a
specially held meeting and agreed to
make John Wilkes and his attorney,
George Bellas, members ‘of this lodge’.
And Jerusalem was not the only lodge to
support the popular candidate, as the
Brethren of the Strong Man Lodge, No.
45 had, two days earlier, ‘unanimously’
agreed to send Wilkes the sum of ten
pounds – a resolution that was duly
reported in The Lloyd’s Evening Post.
In fact, Wilkes was in dire need of
financial support, and within a week The
Society for the Support of the Bill of Rights
had been formed in order to settle his debts,
although its remit soon widened to
‘maintain and defend the legal
Constitutional Liberty of the subject’.
Donations began to flood in from all over
the country and even from overseas. His
Bostonian supporters sent sizeable gifts and
the Assembly of South Carolina gifted him
the magnificent sum of £1500. Indeed, the
day after the Society’s formation, Wilkes
received another letter from the American
‘Sons of Liberty’, this time written by one
William Palfrey who, once again, firmly
pledged their support, declaring, ‘The fate
of Wilkes and America must stand or fall
together.’ Significantly, historians have
overlooked the fact that Palfrey was not
only the Secretary of the Sons of Liberty at
the time, but he was also
the Grand Secretary of
the Grand Lodge of
Massachusetts, and later
became Paymaster
General of the American
forces during the War of
Independence, as well as
aide to George
Washington – another
dedicated Freemason.
A PRISON INITIATION
On 3 March 1769, the
Brethren of Jerusalem
Lodge assembled at their
usual meeting place – the
Jerusalem Tavern in St.
John's Gate, Clerkenwell.
From there a deputation
of the lodge proceeded to
the King’s Bench prison
where, according to the
minutes, they made John
Wilkes and two other key
members of the Society
for the Support of the Bill
of Rights,
George Bellas and John
Churchill, ‘master masons’.
The minutes also recorded
that ‘this lodge was regularly
opened in due form by virtue
of a dispensation under the
hand and seal of Charles
Dillon, Deputy Grand Master,
bearing the date 3rd February
1769, by virtue whereof and
in the name of Henry
Somerset, Duke of Beaufort,
G...M... of Masons’.
Controversially, 3
February was the very same
day that Wilkes had first
been expelled from
Parliament; therefore when
news of his initiation
appeared in the press, it
must have greatly
embarrassed Grand Lodge.
Consequently, on 10 March
they issued a press
statement refuting the story
and vehemently denied that
a dispensation had been
granted. However, their
denial merely elicited an
indignant response from
Thomas Dobsen, the Master
of Jerusalem Lodge, which
was carried in The Lloyd’s
Evening Post. In his
statement, Dobsen not only
affirmed that the initiation
had taken place, but, he stressed, the
‘Dispensation may be seen by any
mason at Jerusalem Lodge, No. 44, on a
lodge night’.
If Thomas Dobsen was telling the
truth, the nomenclature of the Premier
Grand Lodge clearly had a reason to
support the popular candidate. Indeed,
evidence contained in one of Wilkes’s
surviving address books, suggests that
Wilkes knew the Deputy Grand Master,
as it reads: ‘Hon. Mr Dillon’, of
‘Hertford Street, Mayfair’; the book also
contains several addresses of the
members of the Jerusalem Lodge.
Furthermore, in a letter written soon after
his alleged initiation, George Bellas
began by addressing Wilkes as ‘Dear
Brother’.
Whatever lay behind these claims and
counter-claims, there appears to be little
evidence of Wilkes’s connection with
Freemasonry after this time, even though
he continued his parliamentary struggle.
Nevertheless, for historians this whole
episode does provide a fascinating
insight into the relationship between
Freemasonry and the wider society
during the eighteenth century.
Issue 40, Spring 2007
|
© FreemasonryToday 1997-2008
|
|