HOME
Current Issue
Index by Issue
Search the Site
Translate On-Line
Printer Friendly
Internet Help Centre
Regulars
Specials
Humour
Book Reviews
Links
Affinity Lodges
Subscriptions
About FMT
ADVERTISING
Contact Us

BACK
NEXT
April 2002
Issue 20

Letter from the Editor
News Briefing
News and Views
On The Level
International News
Julian Rees
French Freemasonry and the Resistance
All Charged in the Deep - A Raising
The Way of the Labyrinth
A Masonic Gunfighter of the Old West
Entering the Oracle of the Dead
From Role-Play to Ritual
Tales from the Crypt
Masonic Treasures in Leicester
Brother Lightfoote's Journal
Letters to the Editor
Review: Netherworld
Review: The Victorian Celebration of Death
Review: Preston's, Illustrations of Masonry
Review: Verdi: Requiem
Review: Beyond the Five Points
Canon Richard Tydeman
Copyright 1997-2008
FREEMASONRY TODAY
Designed and Maintained by: Cyberpoint Limited
FREEMASONRY TODAY
Book Review


    BEYOND THE FIVE POINTS. MASONIC WINNERS OF THE VICTORIA CROSS AND THE GEORGE CROSS

Phillip R. S. May, GC, edited by Richard Cowley, Twin Pillars Books, 145 Russell St., Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN16 0EW, 2001. Hardback, 358 pages, £35. ISBN 0-9541271-0-2.

This book is the work of the late Philip May, G.C., who sought to document all the holders of the Victoria Cross or the George Cross who were Freemasons; a fascinating project which has certainly produced much valuable information. Unfortunately, Philip May died before his research was complete. Even more unfortunately, the publisher has issued his book without any attempt to finish it. The result is an interesting book marred by defects and perhaps errors: for example, Sir John Graham, V.C., is stated to have been a member of Union Lodge, No.310. References cite the Archives and Library of United Grand Lodge as well as conversations with Graham before his death in 1980. Yet the secretary of Union Lodge states that no record of Graham appears in the minutes of the lodge from 1913 to 1958 when the secretary himself joined. What is the truth? Many other V.C. and G.C. holders are claimed as Freemasons simply upon references to them as "Brother" in masonic newspapers. These appellations may be true; they may also be wishful thinking on the part of editors. No attempt has been made to search out the facts.
    The blame for this sloppiness must fall upon the publisher who writes in a prefatory note that he and Philip May’s widow were "faced with a choice – spend months/years filling the gaps, or publish now. We decided to publish now…". This was, of course, much easier than doing any research. The result degrades the value of Philip May’s hard work. Sadly, in the end, his beloved project is published in a form which renders it so unreliable that it is of limited value to historians of Freemasonry. Perhaps someone else can pick it up and complete it in the way it deserves? Michael Baigent


  Issue 20, April 2002
© FreemasonryToday 1997-2008